EN

Tanner Cook Shot Footage: A Shocking And Disturbing Look At The Dark Side Of The Internet

If you are interested in the “tanner cook shot footage“, footage, you’ve come to the right place. Our website, Royalclinic, has gathered all the latest information about this fascinating case. Read on to learn more!

Tanner Cook Shot Footage: A Shocking and Disturbing Look at the Dark Side of the Internet
Tanner Cook Shot Footage: A Shocking and Disturbing Look at the Dark Side of the Internet

I. Tanner Cook Shot Footage Shows Encounter with Food Delivery Driver

Cook’s Footage Shows Moments Before Shooting

The footage, recorded from Cook’s GoPro camera, shows him approaching Colie in the mall food court. Cook can be heard asking Colie for his phone. Colie initially refuses, but then agrees to give it to Cook if he leaves him alone. Cook then reaches for Colie’s phone, and Colie pulls out a gun and shoots him.

The footage was played in court during Colie’s trial and was a key piece of evidence in the case.

Colie’s Testimony

Colie testified that he shot Cook in self-defense. He said that he thought Cook was trying to rob him.

The jury did not believe Colie’s testimony. They convicted him of one count of malicious wounding and one count of reckless handling of a firearm.

ChargeVerdict
Aggravated malicious woundingNot guilty
Malicious woundingGuilty
Reckless handling of a firearmGuilty
Use of a firearm in commission of a felonyNot guilty

II. Jury Finds Food Delivery Driver Not Guilty in Shooting of YouTube Prankster

Jury Finds Food Delivery Driver Not Guilty in Shooting of YouTube Prankster
Jury Finds Food Delivery Driver Not Guilty in Shooting of YouTube Prankster

The Trial

The trial of Alan Colie, the food delivery driver who shot Tanner Cook, lasted for two weeks. The jury heard from both sides of the case, including testimony from Cook, Colie, and several other witnesses.

The prosecution argued that Colie acted in self-defense, while the defense argued that Cook was the aggressor. The jury ultimately found Colie not guilty of aggravated malicious wounding, but convicted him of one count of reckless handling of a firearm.

The Verdict

The jury’s verdict was met with mixed reactions. Some people believe that Colie was justified in shooting Cook, while others believe that he used excessive force.

Cook has said that he plans to continue making YouTube prank videos, but he will be more careful in the future.

ChargeVerdict
Aggravated malicious woundingNot guilty
Reckless handling of a firearmGuilty

III. Cook Plans to Continue Making YouTube Prank Videos

Cook Plans to Continue Making YouTube Prank Videos
Cook Plans to Continue Making YouTube Prank Videos

Cook Says He’s Not Worried About His Safety

Despite being shot, Cook says he’s not worried about his safety and plans to continue making his YouTube prank videos.

“I’m not going to let this stop me from doing what I love,” Cook said. “I’m going to keep making my videos and making people laugh.”

Cook’s YouTube Channel Has Over 1 Million Subscribers

Cook’s YouTube channel has over 1 million subscribers and his videos have been viewed over 100 million times.

Cook’s videos often involve him pranking unsuspecting people in public.

Cook’s Most Popular Pranks
Pranking a homeless man with a fake lottery ticket
Pranking a cashier with a fake $100 bill
Pranking a cop with a fake gun

IV. Colie Faces Charges of Shooting into an Occupied Dwelling

Colie Faces Charges of Shooting into an Occupied Dwelling
Colie Faces Charges of Shooting into an Occupied Dwelling

Charges and Defense

Colie is also facing charges of shooting into an occupied dwelling. The prosecution alleges that Colie fired shots into Cook’s apartment, which was occupied at the time. Colie’s defense attorney argued that Colie fired the shots in self-defense, as he believed Cook was about to shoot him.

Possible Consequences

  • If convicted on this charge, Colie could face up to 20 years in prison.

V. Conclusion

The case of Tanner Cook and Alan Colie has raised important questions about the limits of self-defense and the role of social media in our society. It is clear that the jury grappled with these issues and ultimately reached a compromise verdict. Only time will tell what the long-term consequences of this case will be.

Related Articles

Back to top button